Post by account_disabled on Dec 20, 2023 1:21:10 GMT -5
An institutionalized party has routinized machinery and persistence but to function. That is Levitsky and Roberts affirm that Peronism functions as a party but has the specificity of operating with serial leadership. A strong leader is followed by another another another or another. The best description of the party machine of successive leaders that Levitsky and Roberts talk about was that of the then governor of Salta province.
Juan Manuel Urtube gave this descri Job Function Email List ption in a newspaper interview a few months before the election. He said look when I have a presidential candidate I don't have one now he will start in September he will be a great leader in my opinion I feel it is closest to the hypothesis of Peronism in October when I win the election I feel like it's like the reincarnation of Peron. That's how we are. The Peronist experience was unique in two respects. Parties founded first by charismatic leaders.
Few survive long periods of exile or the death of their founders. Peronism did it twice; first it endured the exile of its leaders and the persecution of its radicals between 1991 and 1976; then it endured seven years of violent repression shortly after Peron's death. The last military dictatorship. This explanation of the survival of Peronism emphasizes the organizational capacity and resilience of the various actors at the base of the movement. Daniel James analyzes the relative autonomy of provincial governors and unions.
Provincial leader Anna Maria Mustapik examines the fragmented territorial militancy depicted by Levitsky himself and the mass integration of young groups into Peronism in the 1970s. In other words the sectors that allowed Peronism to survive without Peron and that still animate it today are precisely those sectors that emphasize the internal life of the Todos Front. Historically these tensions have been resolved by leadership. Peronism emerged as a conflict with charismatic leadership.
Juan Manuel Urtube gave this descri Job Function Email List ption in a newspaper interview a few months before the election. He said look when I have a presidential candidate I don't have one now he will start in September he will be a great leader in my opinion I feel it is closest to the hypothesis of Peronism in October when I win the election I feel like it's like the reincarnation of Peron. That's how we are. The Peronist experience was unique in two respects. Parties founded first by charismatic leaders.
Few survive long periods of exile or the death of their founders. Peronism did it twice; first it endured the exile of its leaders and the persecution of its radicals between 1991 and 1976; then it endured seven years of violent repression shortly after Peron's death. The last military dictatorship. This explanation of the survival of Peronism emphasizes the organizational capacity and resilience of the various actors at the base of the movement. Daniel James analyzes the relative autonomy of provincial governors and unions.
Provincial leader Anna Maria Mustapik examines the fragmented territorial militancy depicted by Levitsky himself and the mass integration of young groups into Peronism in the 1970s. In other words the sectors that allowed Peronism to survive without Peron and that still animate it today are precisely those sectors that emphasize the internal life of the Todos Front. Historically these tensions have been resolved by leadership. Peronism emerged as a conflict with charismatic leadership.